Ok, I misunderstood the scope of your comment. Anything that will
ultimately provide the needed flexibility sounds fine.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Davis <mtncl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So does this mean that there is no way to provide the ability for custom
>> geometry transformation on the database side?
>>
>>
> I think during the thread many ways to do this kind of customization were
> offered, that would not break
> general filtering support, the bbox idea, the template idea, roll your own
> small templating, and so on,
> none of them requires to shave off proper filter encoding, they are all
> based on the idea that you can
> do a first level filter against the original data, and then a secondary
> filter (the filter the user actually expressed
> in SLD/CQL/Filter encoding) that would do the final shaving off.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
