On 15-11-17 11:57, Andrea Aime wrote:
The main problem seems to be the performance issues though, as this
email also proves, as well as both of the two PR's that are open who
are related to the same thing. But I believe this is rather solvable
and would make a huge difference.
Nope, you're not reading the mail correctly. The main problem is a
lack of a champion backing the module, answering
mails and reviewing PRs related to it. We did not list slowness as a
reason to drop it, the reason is that currently
it's more or less abandoned and we don't know what to do about mails
and PRs related to it.
I read your mail correctly, I meant the email from the user, and I was
referring to the main problem with the _use_ of the module. However that
problem may indirectly explain why the module is not more successful and
therefore abandoned.
Regards
Niels
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
