Jody Garnett wrote: > Can I see a discussion of these issues? Would be surprised what geoapi > list considers interesting :-) I know I could of been watching the > commit list but still. > On a related note I would like to ask Cory if he is going to review > the GeoAPI style interface as part of GeoAPI 2.1. We have agreement to > shelf one of the two implementations ... and perhaps Justin could let > us know if SLD 1.1 is moving at all. (Right now we are in the strange > situation of advertising interfaces against a specification that was > never published.
I've been puttering away at this, this week and wee bits over the month (guess i should commit). The plan is to merge in my changes for 2.1-M1 (they are safely off on a branch until finished). Do we really want geotools to use a snapshot, or do you mean -M0? If it is a snapshot, let's deploy a timestamped jar to the repo :) Cory. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
