On Wednesday 07 February 2007 11:25, Andrea Aime wrote: > Gabriel Roldán ha scritto: > > On Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:28, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Justin Deoliveira wrote: > >>> I see a couple of issues with this approach. And I know that I have > >>> voiced these before but I cant turn down the opportunity to do it > >>> again :) > >> > >> That said I am glad to see the code appearing in an unsupported module > >> (and used to test our Filter implementation) these are the first steps > >> after all. > > > > That means its ok to _fix_ the Filter issue provided that no additional > > burden is added (no reference to the new model, just letting > > evaluate(Object) being called after all)? > > Gabriel, go for it please. > If Jody did not want you to work on it, he should have said it directly.
ok, so I went ahead and fixed it. Also made FidFilter.evaluate(Object) to use PropertyAccessor.get(object, "@id") to abstract it out from the type of object being evaluated. Gabriel > > Cheers > Andrea -- Gabriel Roldán ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Axios Engineering (http://www.axios.es) Tel. +34 944 41 63 84 Fax. +34 944 41 64 90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
