Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Simone Giannecchini a écrit : >> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non >> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop >> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some >> time in that direction. > > Giving more though to that since that time, I now believe that it would not > be > appropriate.
Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another thread on what the best coverage model is? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
