Jody Garnett ha scritto: > I agree with the story aspect! Could we use the pom description to explain > what is going on?
Process process... we already have enough that it's hard to make it respected. If people want to note somewhere about the history of a module that's fine, but I would leave it up to module maintainers. I personally would go for old fashioned README files, but again, up to the maintainer. People interested in unsupported module can just also go and ask. Or be creative and do an "svn log" seeing who worked on it, when, and what he did (assuming people use self explanatory commit messages, which thankfully often happens around here) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
