On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Michael Bedward <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 March 2010 10:30, Simone Giannecchini wrote: >> >> Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not >> look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me. >> > > I'd like to see this happen now on trunk as well. The following is > based on a quick look at the svn logs and some guesses. Please edit... > > Incubator (active development) > ======================= > app-schema > caching > coverage-experiment
> coverageio > coverageio-netcdf I would move this two to legacy > coveragetools > directory > epsg-h2 > idl-process > jai-tools > jdbc-ng > matfile5 > ogr > process > swing > wfs > > Dormant (keep for the moment) > ======================= > epsg-oracle > geometry > geometryless > gpx2 > jts-wrapper > mysql > oracle-spatial > postgis-versioned > shapefile-renderer > sql-datastore > wps > > Legacy (to be removed) > ================== > edigeo > example > vpf > widgets-swing > widgets-swing-pending > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
