Michael Bedward wrote: > On 8 June 2010 15:20, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> MapLayerCollection? That is the best I have been able to come up with, >> so perhaps "Map" is not so bad after all ... :-) >> >> I suppose this is an instance of misused mathematical/compsci jargon >> finally being used for its original purpose. > > I'm a little worried about it. I agree with Jody that Map is the best > name in principle, but in practice it's often going to force users to > qualify the class name. > > Good names aren't my strongpoint either, but what about: > > MapDef > MapDefinition > MapContainer > GTMap
If we go for a longer name (I also agree Map is not the best choice, also thinking about code completion mess here) can't we just keep it named MapContext? :-p The name comes from an OGC spec like quite a bit of other things in GT2, so it would be somehow consistent with the rest. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
