> If we go for a longer name (I also agree Map is not the best choice, > also thinking about code completion mess here) can't we just keep it > named MapContext? :-p
Apparently I should read the entire thread before replying to any single part; yes I can swap things around and use MapContext in place. > The name comes from an OGC spec like quite a bit of other things in > GT2, so it would be somehow consistent with the rest. I actually have some news about that; OWS Context has become an Atom feed; I am going to grab some help from Jim Groffen to see if we can get a parser/encoder going again. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
