On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> <jdeol...@opengeo.org>wrote:
>
>> What about maintaining two separate envelope classes? I didn't look at
>> the patch but if there is any real hard work that goes on inside perhaps it
>> could be deleted out to a utility class.
>
>
> The probem with two separate classes seems that ReferenceEnvelope3D would
> not just be usable in place
> of ReferencedEnvelope, which would make for another complication when
> writing code
>
Sorry, what i meant was ReferencedEnvelope3D would extend
ReferencedEnvelope and then whatever other concrete implementation required
would extend the existing 2D implementation in the same pattern. So the two
implementations could not sure a common super class (but could share a
common interface) but should be a transparent drop in for existing code.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 962313
> mob: +39 339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
