So, in releasing 9.2, I saw the change list, and thought that writing the release notes was going to be straightforward: http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/view/All/job/geotools-release/60/
And then I noticed bleeding-edge changes that I was certain should not be on stable: http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/view/All/job/geotools-release/60/changes#detail8 Commit bd684ec5e0fdb1d7b41c10d8e4cd10e1cf9fd58d by Niels Charlier GEOS-5779 Implementation of SortBy in App-Schema Manual inspection of git log on 9.x confirms that this change is *not* on 9.x. Manual inspection of the source code confirms that this change is not in the 9.2 source bundle. So, is this a known problem? Is this just Hudson scraping the console log and getting the wrong idea? Perhaps we need a big notice in the release guide warning release engineers to ignore Hudson when writing release notes. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
