On 19-04-16 00:32, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I have been monitoring GEOT-5128
> <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5128> looking to delete
> AbstractDataStore and friends - currently in use by the gt-wfs module.
> We have a "new" wfs-ng implementation based on ContentDataStore - that
> is waiting on a firm thumbs up (or a series of bug reports) in order to
> take over duties.

We've had to revert the upgrading of gt-wfs -> gt-wfs-ng due to the 
naming convention change, we cache/store the namespace:typename of 
featuretypes in our software and our things broke down all over the 
place. Though documented, this really bit me in the ass, I expected our 
upgrade to go a bit smoother.

A big plus for the gt-wfs-ng is the updated http library which fixes 
some issues.

I'm assuming this question bubbles up from the wish to drop gt-wfs from 
the library, I for one would like for it to be still around in 15.x

Mark


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to