> It would be really good to get users' feedback about this. Since you ask...
I would prefer to have the documentation of the current stable version. Even better would of course be to have both, clearly distinguished (are they generated automatically, like by Maven?) I'm new to geotools (and I must say that I really love what I have seen so far!), so as for any new library, I first try the latest stable version. Reasons: - since we use OSGi as our deployment platform, I first need to repackage everything as OSGi bundles (common enterprise libraries are provided by SpringSource, bur not geotools, geoapi, jts, etc.) => this is quite a bit of work and I don't want to do it on a moving target - I expect that there would be more information about the stable version in mailing-lists, on Google, and indeed in the documentation This is just to share my opinion, but even if I sometimes got puzzled by discrepancies between examples and the library (some wiki examples seems to be out of date, but that's common with wikis), I find the examples very useful and then I simply dig into the code to get more details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
