Mathieu!

> Reasons:
> - since we use OSGi as our deployment platform, I first need to
> repackage everything as OSGi bundles (common enterprise libraries are
> provided by SpringSource, bur not geotools, geoapi, jts, etc.) => this
> is quite a bit of work and I don't want to do it on a moving target

Can you help us! I so want to include the OSGi manifest information in the 
geotools jars - and have a proposal here. I just lack volunteers (even myself 
cannot volunteer because I don't honestly know what is needed).

Even if you could just review the information here and help update the steps we 
need to perform:
- 
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Add+bundle+information+to+jar+manifest

> - I expect that there would be more information about the stable
> version in mailing-lists, on Google, and indeed in the documentation
> 
> This is just to share my opinion, but even if I sometimes got puzzled
> by discrepancies between examples and the library (some wiki examples
> seems to be out of date, but that's common with wikis), I find the
> examples very useful and then I simply dig into the code to get more
> details.

Yeah wiki's are a pain for being out of date; but it also represents one way in 
which we can collect information about what needs documentation.  I think the 
time for wiki's have passed; our own wiki has such annoying security steps to 
follow due to vandalism it kinds of has lost its appeal as a community scratch 
pad.

On nice thing about the sphinx documentation used for the webpage is that we 
"include" the source examples live from working code in the demo/example 
directory!  Just so we don't run into this sort of problem....

Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to