Actually, just remembered something. What is the consensus on WKT grammar for the empty geometries is it:
POINT POLYGON ... or POINT() POLYGON() or something else? Did OGC verify this (two years gone by) ? Cheers Artem On 10/08/07, Artem Pavlenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/08/07, Mateusz Loskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Artem Pavlenko wrote: > > > On 10/08/07, Andrew Larcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 10 Aug 2007, at 21:05, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > >> > > >> > Andrew Larcombe wrote: > > >> >> Although it's not on the list of supported formats, I *swear* ogr > > >> >> does wkt/wkb. > > >> >> > > >> >> gdal.org/ogr > > >> > > > >> > Yes, it does, but OGR is written in C++ and requires C++ compiler. > > >> > > > >> > > >> Sorry, my bad. Mateusz is right - it has a C API built over the C++ > > >> code. :( > > >> > > > > > > Just to keep this thread going. I've written WKT parser a couple year > > > ago in *C++* using boost::spirit - really fast. > > > > Artem, > > > > Great news! > > Some time ago I started implementing similar thing, using Boost.Spirit. > > > > Here is my grammar and validation stuff: > > Cool, looks pretty much like mine :D > > > > http://mloskot.devjavu.com/projects/mloskot/browser/wkt/trunk > > > > I've had no chance to finish it due to lack of time, but it's > > still on my TODO list :-) > > You spent toooo much time on validation stuff :P > > Cheers > Artem > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Mateusz Loskot > > http://mateusz.loskot.net > > _______________________________________________ > > Geowanking mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > > > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
