Attention is currently required from: msuraev.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849 )

Change subject: libosmonetify SMPP
......................................................................


Patch Set 49:

(17 comments)

File src/libsmpputil/smpp_msc.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/7ebe887b_ad124956
PS49, Line 847:         if (!g_smsc->link) {
why is this check added now?


File src/libsmpputil/smpp_smsc.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/17cecaf8_e7993d7b
PS49, Line 166:                 acl->esme = NULL;
Nice bug here setting to null before calling put on it. Better submit a patch 
preior to this one just fixing this.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/827d4d94_8a9fb4fe
PS49, Line 238:         if (esme->use < 0)
how can use be negative?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/f2536112_0b0eb65f
PS49, Line 347:         osmo_stream_srv_send(esme->srv, msg);
not return value to  check?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/b572a5a8_fa3652fe
PS49, Line 760:         uint32_t smpp_size = esme->read_msg ? 
esme->read_msg->cb[0] : 0;
you are casting unsigned long to "uint32_t". Better keep unsigned long?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/13927ea8_da495010
PS49, Line 772:         rc = osmo_stream_srv_recv(conn, esme->read_msg); /* N. 
B: the data will be appended to previously received (if any) */
move the commend in the line above better.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/4f744e45_a7e2c84e
PS49, Line 775:                 msgb_reset(esme->read_msg);
does msgb_reset also clear esme->read_msg->cb[0]? we need to ensure it is 0 
here.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/17cf7e74_3916a0a6
PS49, Line 791:                         return -EBADF;
why are you returning -EBADF here if the fd is not closed? This is wrong.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/ccc7f6e3_f2d1eb1a
PS49, Line 799:         /* check that we can receive expected amount of data */
This whole block can be moved under the "esme->read_msg->cb[0] = smpp_size;" 
statement above, then it is only checked once instead of each time we receive 
data and the code is clear.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/9a159fd7_4a7055a7
PS49, Line 803:                         LOGPESME(esme, LOGL_ERROR, "unable to 
reallocate %u bytes for message buffer\n", smpp_size);
unable to resize message buffer to %u bytes.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/fddefff1_066f7386
PS49, Line 825: static int esme_link_read_cb(struct osmo_stream_srv *conn)
Do we really need a second level callback function? Why not merging this 
function and the one above and have a goto path for the error paths as we 
usually do?
I was first confused because you were returning  -EBADF in the read callback 
function above.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/86f1073a_4fa4d24e
PS49, Line 843:     default:
wrong indentation.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/d6084949_932b6847
PS49, Line 851: static int esme_link_close_cb(struct osmo_stream_srv *conn)
I foresee some problems with this and esme_destroy. I'll look at it closly when 
you fix the other stuff.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/9fe1950c_2c4962e0
PS49, Line 949:         osmo_stream_srv_link_set_addr(smsc->link, bind_addr ? 
bind_addr : "0.0.0.0");
This should be improve in a follow up patch to probably pass NULL instead of 
"0.0.0.0" in order to support IPv6.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/98f9e91f_48ea9cfa
PS49, Line 985:         osmo_stream_srv_link_close(smsc->link);
you most probably want to set sms->link=NULL here from code I saw above.


File src/libsmpputil/smpp_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/1998658e_38c5f2af
PS49, Line 83:  bool is_running = smsc->link;
Idea: You can probably add an smsc_is_running() API or whatever which checks 
this internally.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849/comment/b1a08b27_fc25b615
PS49, Line 190:                 vty_out(vty, " local-tcp-port %u%s", 
smsc->listen_port ? smsc->listen_port : SMPP_PORT, VTY_NEWLINE);
I wonder why do we want to have listen_port set to 0 at any time, why not set 
it to SMPP_PORT by default?



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/28849
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idc2e60af1010783e555e61b114ae61f55a89d890
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28849
Gerrit-PatchSet: 49
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msur...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msur...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:39:14 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to