Anton Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Re: [gforth] help with gForth 0.6 -- please
> I just tried the current development version on a W2K machine, with > the user input device being an xterm, and the arrow keys as well as ^P > and ^N worked. For the arrow keys, maybe the windows console or > whatever you are using produces different esc-sequences (which ones?) > than the xterm, but ^P and ^N should work in any case. See my previous posting to Bernd. I guess it is a simple compiled-in path "problem." The keys work fine. >> C:\Program Files\gforth>gforth-fast -m 2000000 >> GForth 0.5.0, Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> GForth comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `license' >> Type `bye' to exit >> include ertlbench.fs >> SIEVE 8651 ms elapsed >> BUBBLE 9596 ms elapsed >> MATRIX 8832 ms elapsed >> FIB 10323 ms elapsed ok >> For reference, Win32Forth, Version: 3.5 Build: 0085 >> include ertlbench.fs >> SIEVE Elapsed time: 21000 ms >> BUBBLE Elapsed time: 26117 ms >> MATRIX Elapsed time: 20029 ms >> FIB Elapsed time: 28872 ms >> About 2.5 times slower. > That was on the P54-166, right? The difference between W32Forth and > Gforth-0.5.0 should be small on the Athlon. Yes, it's on the P54c. You mean an Athlon speeds up Win32Forth by a factor 2.5 compared to a P54c? I wish my Athlon did that for iForth :) -marcel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
