On 2015-01-22 at 14:59:51 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: > The current situation is that DPH is not being built or maintained at > all. Given this state of affairs, it is hard to justify keeping it > around---DPH is just bitrotting. > > I am proposing that we reconnect it to the build and keep it building, > putting it in minimal maintenance mode.
Ok, but how do we avoid issues like http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.ghc.devel/5645/ in the future then? DPH became painful back then, because we didn't know what to do with 'vector' (which as a package at the time also suffered from neglect of maintainership) Cheers, hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
