While we're whinging: - I'm looking at the Discussion page for an MR (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/74#note_1904) and I see a comment Simon made, beginning with "No, I am not!". I wanted a bit more context. So I click on the filename above the Discussion and am warped to the Changes view (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/74/diffs#9f8e9eab0dc8b12ae9f92fbb76ddca15c817667a_1852_1853 <https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/74/diffs#9f8e9eab0dc8b12ae9f92fbb76ddca15c817667a_1852_1853>). But Simon's comment isn't there. Instead, I see a different comment, beginning with "In canEqTyVar we now compare kinds...". So I'm lost here.
- Simon recently posted a bunch of comments in response to a bunch of my comments. I have a thick stack of emails about each individual comment. But when I view the discussion page (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/74 <https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/merge_requests/74>), I can find Simon's comments only buried in the Discussions that I started. There appears to be no way to glean, from the web page, what has happened since last I looked. Is there a way to see a "log" of activity on an MR? That way, in case I'm drowning in email (common occurrence) and just want to get up to speed on a given MR, I can get an idea of what's gone on. Now, the thick stack of emails seems like the only way to do this. - Is there a way to get a timestamped list of what discussions are resolved? Sometimes it's nice to be able to check that the resolution was what I had hoped for. - The Changes page has a table of contents on the left. This is useful sometimes. (In this way, GL beats Phab, where it was sometimes hard to find where a certain file is listed when in the middle of a review.) But is there a way to collapse the ToC? Most of the time, I'm focused on the code itself, and the ToC drastically reduces the number of characters per line, when I view diffs side-by-side. Thanks! Richard PS: I well remember how phrustrated I was with Phab when that rolled out, and how I eventually came to appreciate it. I'm being more patient this time around. In retrospect my trouble was more with arcanist than with Phab itself. (Arcanist and I never really got along... we just reached an unsteady truce, and I won't miss it.) I am happy to be using git as the tool now. But it's effortful to figure out efficient workflows in a new space, and I'm grateful for any help here. Thanks. > On Jan 10, 2019, at 1:27 PM, Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote: > > Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com> writes: > >> | Another issue is that apparently GitLab still sends one email per comment >> | instead of one comment per batch. This will evidently be fixed in GitLab >> | 11.6 [1]. >> >> yes that is TERRIBLE. When does 11.6 land? >> > It is the next release. I will poke our contact to make sure that they > realize the severity of the issue. > >> What I want is to have a batch of comments with an overview message. >> We used that /all the time/ in Phab! For example: >> >> I like this patch but you might want to think about X and Y. >> Meanwhile I have added a bunch of detailed comments. >> >> This would fit very well with the "batch of comments in one email" change. >> > Indeed and upstream agrees. They created a feature request [1] in response > to my suggestion. I'll make sure that I mention this to our GitLab contact. > > Cheers, > > - Ben > > > [1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/9145 > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
