Oh sorry, so ignore my tests on ghdl 0.31 and 0.32rc1 on windows. I cannot test it without many changes to my environment ... ghdl uses the analyzed libs from 0.33dev :(
But there was also a Linux test in my last mail showing that it is still
present in 0.33dev.
Can I provide any further information?
Regards
Patrick
-----------------------------------
Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft
Technische Universität Dresden
Fakultät Informatik
Institut für Technische Informatik
Lehrstuhl VLSI-Entwurfssysteme, Diagnostik und Architektur
01062 Dresden
Tel.: +49 351 463-38451
Fax: +49 351 463-38324
Raum: APB-1020
E-Mail: [email protected]
WWW: http://vlsi-eda.inf.tu-dresden.de
-----Original Message-----
From: Ghdl-discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Koontz
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 12:36 AM
To: GHDL discuss list
Subject: Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Error while handling floating point literals in
physical literals
On 9/06/2015, at 10:33 am, Lehmann, Patrick <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Here are further tests:
>
> ghdl 0.31 on windows:
> C:\Tools\GHDL\0.31\bin\ghdl.exe: poc-obj93.cf: bad library format
>
> ghdl 0.32 on windows:
> C:\Tools\GHDL\0.32\bin\ghdl.exe: poc-obj93.cf: bad library format
>
> ghdl 0.33dev (hg commit 821) on windows:
> build_constant: cannot handle IIR_KIND_PHYSICAL_FP_LITERAL
> (D:\git\SATAController\lib\PoC\tb\misc\misc_Noise_tb.vhdl:17:115)
>
> It's independent of '--std=93/02/08'.
Throw away the library and reanalyze it.
Didn't Tristan do something with how the dates were stored in it? The format
would have changed.
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
