On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-29-07 02:00]: > > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote: > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote: > > > > > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no > > > > > skin similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of > > > > > multiple individuals to collaborate in a supply chain comprising > > > > > multiple organisations it is far from being the only reason while > > > > > Gimp is not currently in a position to seriously challenge PS. > > > > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 09:14:50 gimp_user wrote: > > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 06:20:05 gimp_user wrote: > > > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote: > > > > > > > --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy > > > > > > > > user > > ... [much *unnecessary* quoted mat'l removed].... > > While your quoting style suits you and *is* quite complete, frankly it > is a "pain in the ass" to read and very unnecessary as are the > personal posts you made to me. I read the list and am quite capable > of reading your responses to the list. A personal response is only > necessary if unrelated to list traffic and/or really of a personal > nature. > > Anyone who reads the list will have seen your earlier posts and be > aware of the thread history. Most capable individuals will be able to > recapture anything that they may have missed if that interested. > > IMNSHO, it is only necessary for you to quote enough material to put > your answers (?) or arguments into perspective. As a linux user you > *are* held to a higher value and your contributions *will* be seen in > the same light and value as you present yourself here which your > quoting manerism reflects and detracts. > > please see: > http://email.about.com/cs/netiquettetips/qt/et090402.htm > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > > no response necessary or expected!
Well if you need to be that arrogant I guess it is your prerogative _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
