On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>>
>> I had a similar thought while reading through it. I think it would be
>> shorter still with:
>>
>>   FILE *fopen_or_warn(const char *path, const char *mode)
>>   {
>>         FILE *fh = fopen(path, mode);
>>         if (!fh)
>>                 warn_failure_to_read_open_optional_path(path);
>>         return fh;
>>   }
>>
>> And then quite a few of the patches could just be
>> s/fopen/fopen_or_warn/.
>
> Jeff.. oh Jeff.. you have made it _way_ too convenient that after a
> quick grep at fopen( again, I found a couple more places that I would
> have just ignored last time (too much work), but now all I need to do
> is Alt-f to the end of fopen and Alt-/ a few times. Too tempting.. :)

Yes, but (1) we'd need to be careful about --quiet, and (2) we would also need
a wrapper for open(2).

Reply via email to