On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 07:27:20PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Yes, but (1) we'd need to be careful about --quiet
> 
> Yeah. It's a real pain point for making changes like this. At some
> point we should just have a global (maybe multi-level) quiet flag.

I don't think it's too bad here. Isn't it just:

  FILE *fh = quiet ? fopen(x, y) : fopen_or_warn(x, y);

It is a little annoying to have to repeat "x", though (which is
sometimes a git_path() invocation).

-Peff

Reply via email to