Hi Carl, On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> I imagine that a "git commit --amend" would also insert a "replaces" > reference to the original commit but I failed to mention that in my > original post. And cherry-pick, too, of course. Both of these examples hint at a rather huge urge of some users to turn this feature off because the referenced commits may very well be throw-away commits in their case, making the newly-recorded information completely undesired. Example: I am working on a topic branch. In the middle, I see a typo. I commit a fix, continue to work on the topic branch. Later, I cherry-pick that commit to a separate topic branch because I really don't think that those two topics are related. Now I definitely do not want a reference of the cherry-picked commit to the original one: the latter will never be pushed to a public repository, and gc'ed in a few weeks. Of course, that is only my wish, other users in similar situations may want that information. Demonstrating that you would be better served with an opt-in feature that uses notes rather than a baked-in commit header. Ciao, Johannes
