On 11/26/18 5:55 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:47 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Some of the solutions overlap with this thing you want, but I think it's >> worth keeping the distinction between the two in mind. > > On the other hand all use cases should be considered. It's going to be > a mess to have "trashable" attribute that applies to some commands > while "precious" to some others (and even worse when they overlap, > imagine having to define both in .gitattributes)
Agree - I think it would be a very bad idea to have a "mix" of both trashable and precious. IMO, we should try to find which one of these concepts suits most general use cases best and causes less churn for existing scripts/users' existing "semantic expectations", and pick that one. -- Per Lundberg
