deniskuzZ commented on PR #5771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5771#issuecomment-3040996449

   > I think we can even drop getSynchronizedMSC, since there is no 
unsynchronized MetaStoreClient; now all MetaStoreClients are wrapped by 
metastore.client.SynchronizedMetaStoreClient. I'm not sure why we introduced 
two redundant synchronization mechanism in 
HiveMetaStoreClient.newSynchronizedClient 
([HIVE-1899](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1899)) and hive-exec 
SynchronizedMetaStoreClient 
([HIVE-14204](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14204)), but I believe 
that we can unify them into a single class. I'm OK with going with any weaker 
changes as well, but I would like to hear your thoughts on the proposed commit.
   > (The commit can be found in 
[here](https://github.com/ngsg/hive/commit/71ed3c1f9d240c53de7418dfa8f8463fdc45dfd9).)
   
   The change makes sense given the current code, but not all clients were 
synchronized previously, were they?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@hive.apache.org

Reply via email to