prodriguezdefino commented on code in PR #32529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/32529#discussion_r1799871523


##########
sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/providers/BigQueryStorageWriteApiSchemaTransformProvider.java:
##########
@@ -466,11 +530,11 @@ BigQueryIO.Write<Row> 
createStorageWriteApiTransform(Schema schema) {
               .withFormatFunction(BigQueryUtils.toTableRow())
               .withWriteDisposition(WriteDisposition.WRITE_APPEND);
 
-      if (configuration.getTable().equals(DYNAMIC_DESTINATIONS)) {
-        checkArgument(
-            schema.getFieldNames().equals(Arrays.asList("destination", 
"record")),
-            "When writing to dynamic destinations, we expect Row Schema with a 
"
-                + "\"destination\" string field and a \"record\" Row field.");
+      // in case CDC writes are configured we validate and include them in the 
configuration
+      if (Optional.ofNullable(configuration.getUseCdcWrites()).orElse(false)) {
+        write = validateAndIncludeCDCInformation(write, schema);

Review Comment:
   I tried building this logic previously but is not possible given this 
existing 
[check](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryIO.java#L3367).
 
   
   Setting a dynamic destination does not clear a previously set table 
reference or serializable function, so when that logic is implemented and a 
dynamic destination is configured for CDC the check makes it fail. 
   
   The current logic is the simplest way I found to resolve the problem of 
having those 3 possible branches: CDC with(out) DD, only DD, or just table 
reference. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to