Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
...
>
> > (HDirect doesn't currently allow you to map enums to newtypes of Int
> > (say), but it could. No big deal).
>
> Hmm, IMHO it's not enum that should be mapped to newtype but a simple
> typedef: Enums have a certain bounded set of possible values while
> something like 'typedef unsigned long off_t' has not (at least
> conceptually). I consider the automatic wrapping/unwrapping into
> newtypes as a crucial feature of any kind of type-safe IDL, so it
> should definitely included into H/Direct.
>
That's a different issue; you can use 'interface {}' decls to achieve
this kind of type safety.
--sigbjorn
- Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Frank A. Christoph
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Sven Panne
- RE: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Xlib IDL for H/Direct? Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
