On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:34:22AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > | 4. A more radical change would be introducing hierarchical modules. This > | could be just a matter of renaming the directories to start with an upper > | case character and changing the import declarations. This gives module names > | like "Typecheck.TcGadt". The tc is redundant here, so perhaps it should be > | renamed to "Typecheck.Gadt" or "Typecheck.GADT". Perhaps even better would > | be "GHC.Typecheck.GADT", this way some modules can be exposed as part of the > | GHC api. > > I don't think I'd object, but I'm not sure that much is gained here. We > don't spend much time on mondule-name clashes.
One point is that GHC uses module names like Util and State, which is a bit unfriendly to people using GHC-as-a-library. Also, although "import Types.Generics" is a bit longer to type, it is also a bit easier for someone less familiar with the code to follow the imports (if their editor does not help them). It's a pity that GHC.* is already used in base. I'm not sure what the best thing to do is in the short term. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
