Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Brian Hulley wrote:
In the long term, Haskell needs a better module system IMHO [...]
I agree with the symptoms that were described, but I draw a different
conclusion.
We don't need to change the language - we need better tools (IDEs)
that operate not at the textual level, but use the annotated syntax tree,
including knowledge on fully qualified names and types.
Hi Johannes,
I agree that better tools would be a good thing, and could improve the
programming experience considerably, but I still think that an improved
module system design would be an orthogonal benefit.
Best regards, Brian.
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
