Hello, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian, I completely agree with you. I love the darcs vcs model, too. > However, we have three discussions here: > > (1) Do we want darcs vcs model? > > Except Thomas Schilling, who seems to be dead set to get rid of darcs, > everybody who voiced their opinion seems to be in favour of the darcs model.
I also don't think that the darcs model has much to offer over git, in fact I find that it lacks some useful features (not counting a reliable implementation). Examples include good support for branching, and being able to easily determine the version of the software that is in a repository (git uses a hash of the content to identify the current state, so it is easy to check if we two developers have the same version of the content). By the way, git's UI is really not as bad as people seem to think. For everyday development "git gui" works very well, and provides a nice GUI that lets you see what you have modified, choose what you want to record, and push/pull from other repos. -Iavor _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
