On Mar 16, 2010, at 19:47 , Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 03/16/10 19:38, Iavor Diatchki wrote:Something doesn't add up for me here. If *all* GHC-compiled programs require an executable data segment, then how could a preprocessor possibly remedy this problem? (and likewise, how does the static_wrapper patch do so...)The fact that, at present, all GHC-compiled programs require an executable data segment is a fairly significant problem.
A goodly chunk of the RTS uses the FFI to access host functions; presumably he also intends rewriting those to use the new import/ export type.
-- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [email protected] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [email protected] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
