| The lack of response, I believe, is just a lack of anyone who
| can cut through all the noise and come up with some
| practical way to move forward in one of the many possible
| directions.

You're right.  But it is very telling that the vast majority of responses on 
        
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/nph9l/records_stalled_again_leadership_needed/
were not about the subject (leadership) but rather on suggesting yet more, 
incompletely-specified solutions to the original problem.  My modest attempt to 
build a consensus by articulating the simplest solution I could think of, 
manifestly failed.  

The trouble is that I just don't have the bandwidth (or, if I'm honest, the 
motivation) to drive this through to a conclusion. And if no one else does 
either, perhaps it isn't *that* important to anyone.  That said, it clearly is 
*somewhat* important to a lot of people, so doing nothing isn't very 
satisfactory either.

Usually I feel I know how to move forward, but here I don't.

Simon



_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to