On Thursday, February 14, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de > (mailto:m...@joachim-breitner.de)> wrote: > I don't think having FFI far down the stack is a problem. There are lots of > pure data types we'd like in the "pure data" layer (e.g. bytestring) that > uses FFI. As long as the I/O layer itself (System.IO, the I/O manager, etc) > doesn't get pulled in there's no real problem in depending on the FFI. Doesn't the FFI pull in some part of the I/O layer, though? In particular threaded programs are going to end up using forkOS?
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
