Michael Tobis wrote: > That's great! Now how about if you explain it a little more > didactically so the rest of us can get it?
Don't get him started--we'll never be able to get him to stop :-) Seriously, James has had a damn good try at explaining these issues on his blog, in a form that even I might hope to understand http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-on-detection-attribution-and.html http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-on-detection-attribution-and_15.html http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-on-detection-attribution-and_16.html -- Mark Hadfield "Kei puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tahi tatou" [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
