On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:34 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Today's test results are updated in the spreadsheet in sheet named "Run > patch set 8". > > I took in patch https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20685 which > caused quite a few failures, so not updating new failures as issue yet. > > Please look at the failures for tests that were retried and passed, as > the logs for the initial runs should be preserved from this run onward. > > Otherwise nothing else to report on the run status, if you are averse to > spreadsheets look at this comment in gerrit [1]. > > Shyam > > [1] Patch set 8 run status: > > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/8#message-54de30fa384fd02b0426d9db6d07fad4eeefcf08 > On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep > enough. > > > > NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on > > how to find failures. > > > > 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2]. > > > > 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run > > Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run > > that it failed in. > > > > 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think > > you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out. > > > > 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with > > your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as > > comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted). > > > > 5) Current test failures > > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or > > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back). > > > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs > > attention) > > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh) > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t > > (Atin) > > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish) > > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh) > > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention) > > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention) > > ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention) > > ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention) > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin) > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi) > > > > Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores > > in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new. > > > > ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t > > ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t > > ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t > > ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t > > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t > > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t > Sent https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20697 for the test above. > > > ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t > > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t > > > > 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are, > > > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t > > ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t > > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t > > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t > > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t > > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t > > > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t > > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t > > ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t > > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t > > ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t > > > > Shyam (and Atin) > > > > On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same. > >> > >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in > >> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions > >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed. > >> > >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit > >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay. > >> > >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my > >> destabilize it. > >> > >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present here > >> [3]. > >> > >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this > >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shyam > >> > >> [1] Patches that address regression failures: > >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com > >> > >> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run: > >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637 > >> > >> [3] Failing tests list: > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing > >> > >> [4] Nightly run dashboard: > https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel