On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:02 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:34 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Today's patch set 7 [1], included fixes provided till last evening IST, >> and its runs can be seen here [2] (yay! we can link to comments in >> gerrit now). >> >> New failures: (added to the spreadsheet) >> ./tests/bugs/protocol/bug-808400-repl.t (core dumped) >> ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t >> >> Older tests that had not recurred, but failed today: (moved up in the >> spreadsheet) >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t >> ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t >> > > The above test is timing out. I had to increase the timeout while adding > the .t so that creation of maximum number of links that will max-out in > ext4. Will re-check if it is the same issue and get back. > This test is timing out with lcov. I bumped up timeout to 30 minutes @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/20699, I am not happy that this test takes so long, but without this it is difficult to find regression on ext4 which has limits on number of hardlinks in a directory(It took us almost one year after we introduced regression to find this problem when we did introduce regression last time). If there is a way of running this .t once per day and before each release. I will be happy to make it part of that. Let me know. > > >> >> Other issues; >> Test ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t core dumped again >> Few geo-rep failures, Kotresh should have more logs to look at with >> these runs >> Test ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t dumped core again >> >> Atin/Amar, we may need to merge some of the patches that have proven to >> be holding up and fixing issues today, so that we do not leave >> everything to the last. Check and move them along or lmk. >> >> Shyam >> >> [1] Patch set 7: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/7 >> [2] Runs against patch set 7 and its status (incomplete as some runs >> have not completed): >> >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/7#message-37bc68ce6f2157f2947da6fd03b361ab1b0d1a77 >> (also updated in the spreadsheet) >> >> On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> > Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep >> enough. >> > >> > NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on >> > how to find failures. >> > >> > 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2]. >> > >> > 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run >> > Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run >> > that it failed in. >> > >> > 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think >> > you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out. >> > >> > 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with >> > your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as >> > comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted). >> > >> > 5) Current test failures >> > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or >> > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back). >> > >> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs >> > attention) >> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh) >> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t >> > (Atin) >> > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish) >> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh) >> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention) >> > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention) >> > ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention) >> > ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention) >> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin) >> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi) >> > >> > Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores >> > in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new. >> > >> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t >> > ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t >> > ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t >> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t >> > >> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t >> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t >> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t >> > >> ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t >> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t >> > >> > 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are, >> > >> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t >> > ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t >> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t >> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t >> > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t >> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t >> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t >> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t >> > >> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t >> > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t >> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t >> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t >> > ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t >> > >> > Shyam (and Atin) >> > >> > On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> >> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same. >> >> >> >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in >> >> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions >> >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed. >> >> >> >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit >> >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay. >> >> >> >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my >> >> destabilize it. >> >> >> >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present >> here >> >> [3]. >> >> >> >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this >> >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Shyam >> >> >> >> [1] Patches that address regression failures: >> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com >> >> >> >> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run: >> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637 >> >> >> >> [3] Failing tests list: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> [4] Nightly run dashboard: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintain...@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >> > > > -- > Pranith > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
