Hi Shyam/Atin, I have posted the patch[1] for geo-rep test cases failure: tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t
Please include patch [1] while triggering tests. The instrumentation patch [2] which was included can be removed. [1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/20704/ [2] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/20477/ Thanks, Kotresh HR On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:02 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:34 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Today's patch set 7 [1], included fixes provided till last evening IST, >>> and its runs can be seen here [2] (yay! we can link to comments in >>> gerrit now). >>> >>> New failures: (added to the spreadsheet) >>> ./tests/bugs/protocol/bug-808400-repl.t (core dumped) >>> ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t >>> >>> Older tests that had not recurred, but failed today: (moved up in the >>> spreadsheet) >>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t >>> ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t >>> >> >> The above test is timing out. I had to increase the timeout while adding >> the .t so that creation of maximum number of links that will max-out in >> ext4. Will re-check if it is the same issue and get back. >> > > This test is timing out with lcov. I bumped up timeout to 30 minutes @ > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/20699, I am not happy that > this test takes so long, but without this it is difficult to find > regression on ext4 which has limits on number of hardlinks in a > directory(It took us almost one year after we introduced regression to find > this problem when we did introduce regression last time). If there is a way > of running this .t once per day and before each release. I will be happy to > make it part of that. Let me know. > > >> >> >>> >>> Other issues; >>> Test ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t core dumped again >>> Few geo-rep failures, Kotresh should have more logs to look at with >>> these runs >>> Test ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t dumped core again >>> >>> Atin/Amar, we may need to merge some of the patches that have proven to >>> be holding up and fixing issues today, so that we do not leave >>> everything to the last. Check and move them along or lmk. >>> >>> Shyam >>> >>> [1] Patch set 7: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/7 >>> [2] Runs against patch set 7 and its status (incomplete as some runs >>> have not completed): >>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/7#message- >>> 37bc68ce6f2157f2947da6fd03b361ab1b0d1a77 >>> (also updated in the spreadsheet) >>> >>> On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> > Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep >>> enough. >>> > >>> > NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on >>> > how to find failures. >>> > >>> > 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2]. >>> > >>> > 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run >>> > Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run >>> > that it failed in. >>> > >>> > 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think >>> > you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out. >>> > >>> > 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with >>> > your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as >>> > comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted). >>> > >>> > 5) Current test failures >>> > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or >>> > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back). >>> > >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs >>> > attention) >>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh) >>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated- >>> volume-options.t >>> > (Atin) >>> > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish) >>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh) >>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention) >>> > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention) >>> > ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention) >>> > ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention) >>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin) >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi) >>> > >>> > Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores >>> > in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new. >>> > >>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t >>> > ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t >>> > ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync- >>> post-glusterd-restart.t >>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with- >>> other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t >>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t >>> > >>> > 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are, >>> > >>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t >>> > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry- >>> txn-on-quorum-failure.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t >>> > ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t >>> > >>> > Shyam (and Atin) >>> > >>> > On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> >> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same. >>> >> >>> >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched >>> in >>> >> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions >>> >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed. >>> >> >>> >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit >>> >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay. >>> >> >>> >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my >>> >> destabilize it. >>> >> >>> >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present >>> here >>> >> [3]. >>> >> >>> >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this >>> >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Shyam >>> >> >>> >> [1] Patches that address regression failures: >>> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com >>> >> >>> >> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run: >>> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637 >>> >> >>> >> [3] Failing tests list: >>> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_ >>> -crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing >>> >> >>> >> [4] Nightly run dashboard: https://build.gluster.org/job/ >>> nightly-master/ >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Gluster-devel mailing list >>> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> maintainers mailing list >>> maintain...@gluster.org >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >>> >> >> >> -- >> Pranith >> > > > -- > Pranith > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel