If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then please provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have noticed that there are so many glusterfsd threads are running in my > system and we observed some of those thread consuming more cpu. I did > “strace” on two such threads (before the problem disappeared by itself) and > found that there is a continuous activity like below: > > lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8- > 4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz", > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=1995, ...}) = 0 > lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f- > 246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz", > "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data > available) > lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f- > 246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz", > "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data > available) > lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8- > 4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz", > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=169, ...}) = 0 > lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f- > 246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz", > "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data > available) > lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f- > 246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz", > "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data > available) > > I have found the below existing issue which is very similar to my scenario. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298258 > > We are using the gluster-3.7.6 and it seems that the issue is fixed in > 3.8.4 version. > > Could you please let me know why it showing the number of above logs and > reason behind it as it is not explained in the above bug. > > Regards, > Abhishek > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > -- Regards Abhishek Paliwal
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users