Hi Kotresh, Could you please update whether it is possible to get the patch or bakport this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 version.
Regards, Abhishek On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:14 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the way to take this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 or only way to upgrade > the version? > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Kotresh, >> >> I have seen the patch available on the link which you shared. It seems we >> don't have some files in gluser 3.7.6 which you modified in the patch. >> >> Is there any possibility to provide the patch for Gluster 3.7.6? >> >> Regards, >> Abhishek >> >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < >> khire...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Abhishek, >>> >>> Bitrot requires versioning of files to be down on writes. >>> This was being done irrespective of whether bitrot is >>> enabled or not. This takes considerable CPU. With the >>> fix https://review.gluster.org/#/c/14442/, it is made >>> optional and is enabled only with bitrot. If bitrot >>> is not enabled, then you won't see any setxattr/getxattrs >>> related to bitrot. >>> >>> The fix would be available in 3.11. >>> >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Kotresh H R >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com> >>> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> >>> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-de...@gluster.org>, "gluster-users" < >>> gluster-users@gluster.org>, "Kotresh Hiremath >>> > Ravishankar" <khire...@redhat.com> >>> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:30:57 AM >>> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] High load on glusterfsd process >>> > >>> > Hi Kotresh, >>> > >>> > Could you please update me on this? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Abhishek >>> > >>> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >>> > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > +Kotresh who seems to have worked on the bug you mentioned. >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >>> > > abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then >>> > >> please provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6 >>> > >> >>> > >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >>> > >> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Hi Team, >>> > >>> >>> > >>> I have noticed that there are so many glusterfsd threads are >>> running in >>> > >>> my system and we observed some of those thread consuming more cpu. >>> I >>> > >>> did “strace” on two such threads (before the problem disappeared by >>> > >>> itself) >>> > >>> and found that there is a continuous activity like below: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4 >>> > >>> dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170 >>> 126T113552+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=1995, ...}) = 0 >>> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >>> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_2 >>> 0170126T113552+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >>> data >>> > >>> available) >>> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >>> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_2 >>> 0170126T113552+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >>> data >>> > >>> available) >>> > >>> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4 >>> > >>> dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T >>> 180550+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=169, ...}) = 0 >>> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >>> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170 >>> 123T180550+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >>> data >>> > >>> available) >>> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >>> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170 >>> 123T180550+0000.log.gz", >>> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >>> data >>> > >>> available) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> I have found the below existing issue which is very similar to my >>> > >>> scenario. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298258 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> We are using the gluster-3.7.6 and it seems that the issue is >>> fixed in >>> > >>> 3.8.4 version. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Could you please let me know why it showing the number of above >>> logs and >>> > >>> reason behind it as it is not explained in the above bug. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Regards, >>> > >>> Abhishek >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Regards >>> > >>> Abhishek Paliwal >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> Regards >>> > >> Abhishek Paliwal >>> > >> >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> Gluster-users mailing list >>> > >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >>> > >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Pranith >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > Abhishek Paliwal >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > -- Regards Abhishek Paliwal
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
