What is the way to take this patch on Gluster 3.7.6 or only way to upgrade the version?
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kotresh, > > I have seen the patch available on the link which you shared. It seems we > don't have some files in gluser 3.7.6 which you modified in the patch. > > Is there any possibility to provide the patch for Gluster 3.7.6? > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > khire...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi Abhishek, >> >> Bitrot requires versioning of files to be down on writes. >> This was being done irrespective of whether bitrot is >> enabled or not. This takes considerable CPU. With the >> fix https://review.gluster.org/#/c/14442/, it is made >> optional and is enabled only with bitrot. If bitrot >> is not enabled, then you won't see any setxattr/getxattrs >> related to bitrot. >> >> The fix would be available in 3.11. >> >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Kotresh H R >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpali...@gmail.com> >> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> >> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-de...@gluster.org>, "gluster-users" < >> gluster-users@gluster.org>, "Kotresh Hiremath >> > Ravishankar" <khire...@redhat.com> >> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:30:57 AM >> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] High load on glusterfsd process >> > >> > Hi Kotresh, >> > >> > Could you please update me on this? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Abhishek >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >> > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +Kotresh who seems to have worked on the bug you mentioned. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >> > > abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > >> If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then >> > >> please provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6 >> > >> >> > >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >> > >> abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi Team, >> > >>> >> > >>> I have noticed that there are so many glusterfsd threads are >> running in >> > >>> my system and we observed some of those thread consuming more cpu. I >> > >>> did “strace” on two such threads (before the problem disappeared by >> > >>> itself) >> > >>> and found that there is a continuous activity like below: >> > >>> >> > >>> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4 >> > >>> dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170 >> 126T113552+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=1995, ...}) = 0 >> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_ >> 20170126T113552+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >> data >> > >>> available) >> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_ >> 20170126T113552+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >> data >> > >>> available) >> > >>> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4 >> > >>> dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T >> 180550+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=169, ...}) = 0 >> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170 >> 123T180550+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >> data >> > >>> available) >> > >>> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92 >> > >>> f8-4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170 >> 123T180550+0000.log.gz", >> > >>> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No >> data >> > >>> available) >> > >>> >> > >>> I have found the below existing issue which is very similar to my >> > >>> scenario. >> > >>> >> > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298258 >> > >>> >> > >>> We are using the gluster-3.7.6 and it seems that the issue is fixed >> in >> > >>> 3.8.4 version. >> > >>> >> > >>> Could you please let me know why it showing the number of above >> logs and >> > >>> reason behind it as it is not explained in the above bug. >> > >>> >> > >>> Regards, >> > >>> Abhishek >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Regards >> > >>> Abhishek Paliwal >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Regards >> > >> Abhishek Paliwal >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> Gluster-users mailing list >> > >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >> > >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Pranith >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > Abhishek Paliwal >> > >> > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > -- Regards Abhishek Paliwal
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users