Please try to hepl me.. Box[ 2]={ nan, nan, nan} Can
not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel
to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported. Box
(3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 1]={
nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan, nan, nan} Can
not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel
to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported. Box
(3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 1]={
nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan, nan, nan} Can
not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel
to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported. Box
(3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 1]={
nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan, nan, nan} Can
not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector parallel
to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported. Box
(3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 1]={
nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan, nan, nan} Can
not fix pbc.
------------------------------------------------------- Program mdrun,
VERSION 4.0.4 Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348
Fatal error: Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box
collapsed.
-------------------------------------------------------
"Would You Like to Be the Monster Tonight ?" (Captain Beefheart)
OIn some pev Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ms. Aswathy S"
<aswat...@amritapuri.amrita.edu> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
<gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:40:04 PM GMT
+05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users]
problem in ngmx
hi justin,
your suggestions were helpful. Actually charges in the ligand topology
was having the problem. So I have added the charges from the antechamber.
Did Energy minimization. Now did an NVT equilibration of 10 ps. It
finished at 2600 steps. But shows reasonable Energy and Temperature
(checked in the xmgrace). Seems it works fine..Now started the NPT
equilibration.
Thank you very much for your support.
Aswathy Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu>
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent:
Monday, June 15, 2009 4:58:20 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New
Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the reply.
Once again i tried to minimize the protein +ligand in vacuum. Also
tried by varying the maximum force constant. But that too converged at
the 15 th step (or lesser steps based on the Fmax). The em.mdp file i
have attached here with. Please go through that once please and tell me
because of any of these parameters, the system behaves odd??.
As I said before, it is not the step that matters, it is whether or not
the system converges within your criteria. I am assuming EM is working,
based on the fact that the process converges differently depending on
different target values for Fmax. Your .mdp file looks reasonable.
If we can clarify for a moment - several messages ago you claimed that
you were doing a 20-ps NVT equilibration that was finishing at 15 steps,
but that appears to not be the case. Is it the NVT step that is failing
to complete? Is ngmx failing to display the NVT trajectory, and did
gmxcheck report problems with the .edr file?
I think you are correct that the itp file created by PRODRG need
corrections. But how can I chek that is that the problem with that file
or how can i rectify?
Parameterization is very difficult. Prepare for a lot of advanced work.
Please see here:
http://oldwiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Parameterization
-Justin
Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu>
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent:
Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:51:30 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai,
New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
Hi Justin,
I tried maximum to find out the problem but i failed in that.
I will give you the detailed steps..Kindly check once and tell me
where is the problem. As you suggested now i am trying in gromacs
4.0.4 . 1. The ligand topology file is generated in PRODRG beta
server using the GROMOS 96.1 force field. 2. The protein toplogy file
using gromos 96 43 a1 force field 3. Tried to minimize in vacuum
(Please find the em.mdp file). But the cycle finished at 15 steps.
But in some previous post I saw that its not an error so I went ahead
with genbox and further minimization. But ended in the same 15 th
steps. also checked the gmxcheck for the files as you suggested it
show the following error.
What is most important is not the number of steps necessarily, but that
the potential energy converged to an appropriate value and you reached
an Fmax below your target.
Realize that using a topology straight from PRODRG is often not the
best course. The charges and charge groups assigned by PRODRG often
require manual modification and verification of the parameters. This
could be a source of problem.
It may be that there is some kind of bug, but before that can be
proposed, you have to demonstrate that the preparation steps were
successful (i.e., EM criteria of potential energy and Fmax).
-Justin
'', 33685 atoms Last frame 0 time 1.000
Both files read correctly Checking energy file 1RBP_water_min.edr
------------------------------------------------------- Program
gmxcheck, VERSION 4.0.4 Source code file: enxio.c, line: 283
Fatal error: Energy file 1RBP_water_min.edr not recognized, maybe
different CPU?
-------------------------------------------------------
"I Do It All the Time" (Magnapop)
Am I doing any mistake in the steps???? Please find some time to help
me.
Thank you very much, Aswathy Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul"
<jalem...@vt.edu> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
<gmx-users@gromacs.org> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 6:23:04 PM GMT
+05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users]
problem in ngmx
Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply...
gmxcheck of my out shows a "segementation fault" in the last part.
What could be the problem??
this is the last part of the output
x[31416] (-7.37978e-03 6.79718e+00 6.07531e+00) - (-7.40000e-03
6.79720e+00 6.07530e+00) x[31428] ( 2.35365e-01 -6.53947e-03
5.65519e+00) - ( 2.35400e-01 -6.50000e-03 5.65520e+00) x[31478] (
1.54478e-02 6.14019e+00 5.74537e+00) - ( 1.54000e-02
6.14020e+00 5.74540e+00) Segmentation fault
The energy minimisation & the equilibration steps are finished at
15 step eventhough it was given for 20 ps(10000 steps).But the
output coordinates file doesnt show any abnornmality as i checked
in the viewer? My equilibration step was in NVT.
whether nothing is happening or any other problem?
If you got 15 steps when you expected 10000, it seems pretty clear to
me that something crashed very early on in your simulation.
-Justin
Thanks & regards, Aswathy
Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
----- Original Message ----- From: "Manik Mayur"
<manik.ma...@gmail.com> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
<gmx-users@gromacs.org>, jalem...@vt.edu Sent: Saturday, June 13,
2009 5:34:08 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Florian Dommert <
domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de > wrote:
* Justin A. Lemkul < jalem...@vt.edu > [2009-06-13 07:31:17 -0400]:
Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
Hi,
after equlibration of my protein and ligand I tried to create the
energy file ans well as the to display the trajectories using ngmx
option,. But it shows the follo: error,
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: No protocol
specified
Can't connect to X Server. Check your DISPLAY environment variable
Seems like your X environment is somehow not properly configured.
If you are working through ssh, then you can :
$export DISPLAY=<your current computer's ip>:0.0
Or you are tunneling through a SSH connection. There are several
possiblities:
1. Try ssh -X to login, this could solve the problem, if you are in
principle allowed to use X11 tunneling. 2. In case this does not
work either it can be that you are not allowed to tunnel X11.
However take care that you also need a properly configured XServer
running on your own system not just on the host you login. So in
case you use Windows or MacOS make sure this is the case.
Flo
************************************************
also the g_energy command shows that ,
Program g_energy_mpi, VERSION 3.3.3 Source code file: enxio.c,
line: 239
Fatal error: Energy file eq_2ps_ener.edr not recognized, maybe
different CPU?
What does gmxcheck tell you about the file. Perhaps it has been
corrupted in some way.
Also, you may want to work with a more current version (4.0.5) to
utilize the newest features and bug fixes.
-Justin
Can any one help me, please???
Thanks, Aswathy ASBT Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
_______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing
list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search
the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please
don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org . Can't post?
Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list
gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the
archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't
post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send
it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
