On 1/09/2011 6:32 PM, Itamar Kass wrote:
Hi Tsjerk,

Thanks for the help, it actually worked. When nstpcouple is set to 1m the 
system can be equilibrated (NPT) without LINCS error. I hadn't thought about it 
as I never use NVT (unless doing FE calculations).

Equilibrating with NVT before NPT can be wise when the system starts far from equilibrium.



Is this mean the 4.5.4 is more sensitive the 4.0.7? Is this effect the data 
collected till now? If this is the case, why 5 ns simulations done with 4.0.7 
crashed when extended it using 4.5.4?

IIRC 4.0.x and 4.5.x have different mechanisms for deciding how often to do global communication for things like T and P coupling. Mostly you can get away with the same kind of approximation one uses with twin-range neighbour lists, periodic neighbour list updates, RESPA, etc. where slowly-varying quantities don't have to be recalculated every step. However during equilibration (and that includes the transition from 4.0.x to 4.5.x) those assumptions need not be valid. So tuning the update frequency to be high during transitions is a good idea. Then relax them and see how you go.

Mark


Also, is this mean I can do my productive run using 4.5.4 with the default 
value of nstpcouple, it seems that setting it to 1 greatly increases the 
computational time. To the best of my knowledge, in prior version nstpcouple 
was set to 1 by default.

Cheers,
Itamar


On 01/09/2011, at 4:47 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:

Hi Itamar,

I haven't really followed the discussion and I'm a bit too lazy to
look it all up now ;) But have you tried setting the nst parameters to
1  (except for output). Especially nstpcouple. Note that nstpcouple=1
requires nstlist=1 and nstcalcenergy=1. If that solves the problem,
you may need to extend your equilibration a bit, first relaxing NVT,
followed by NPT with nstpcouple=1, thereafter equilibrating using
productions conditions. It it solves it, maybe the option should be
renamed nstptrouble :p

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to