On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Shachar Kaufman wrote: > Is there a simple way of using an atomic demux-and-decode unit without > passing demux-ed encoded elementary bitstream frames back to gnash? This > atomic unit of mine is entirely in hardware and forcing it to dispence > encoded elementary bisttream frames and timestamps back to software would be > a major performance no-no.
Good question. The thing is the design is mainly done to support the broadest use case, which is FLV. FLV contains also tags and the like, which we want to query from the parser. Also, separating demux from decode serves the purpose of indexing offset to keyframes, which you can seek to. In any case the current users expect to find timestamps in the queue, so your best bet would be to demux-and-decode in one step and store the result in the queues, then do nothing from the decoder (except a memory copy). Mind you: might take up a lot of memory if bufferTime (user-defined) is big. --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
