Hi everyone, as the Lightspark author and main developer I cannot help wondering why Gnash developers are willing to waste so much money and time reimplementing something that is already available in LS. The AVM2 implementation in Lightspark is fairly complete, especially the interpreter. The optimizing LLVM backend needs some attentions to be back on track [more details on this below].
You could argument that I should have worked on Gnash in the beginning, but I wanted to build something new: a technology platform that could really be future proof. At this point I can say to have partly succeeded as I'm very happy of the graphics handling (especially the new engine not yet merged in master) and threading approach, while I'm not completely satisfied by the LLVM backend, and I'm considering switching to Chromium's V8 (if a suitable AST could be generated from the AVM2 bytecode). I've not any money to offer, but I'd like to invite all the devs to take a look at lightspark code and join our efforts. Regards, Alessandro Pignotti On Wednesday 20 October 2010 12:40:08 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Ashley Reid] > > > I would gladly take part, but is 1000$ really enough? What is the > > actual cost estimate? I would imagine something around the 5000$ > > mark? > > I intended (and actually also inserted) 50 to be the limit and not 10, > but after moving back and forth in the pledgebank web gui for a while > my 50 went back to 10 without me noticing. > > So there is no need to stop when we have 10 people signing the > pledge. :) > > The estimate I got from Rob to get "hello world" in AVM2 to work was > 3-4 months of work, so your estimate on 5000$ is probably in the > correct ballpark. When that is said, I am sure 1000$ will help > too. :) > > Happy hacking,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
