On 03/22/11 15:16, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Does this mean you think the old functions are to be replaced ?
> Is it really necessary ? Can you give more details on the issue ?
It's not necessary, but as bwy pointed out, there currently there is
some duplication of accessors that work slightly differently. I had
planned to make all the existing renderers work "the new way", but like
I said, that's the following phase after this one. I have enough to do
before this gets merged in as it is.
> I hope you'll be as wise to also accept the reviews and act upon them.
I didn't say I was ignoring review comments. I only said that I'm not
forcing anyone to look at this code, whether they do so is up to them. I
don't need a code review to check this in, I'm just trying to give
anyone that cares a chance for input before I do so.
- rob -
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
