On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:59:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated: 24 Mar 2003 15:48:05 EST > Jeff Macdonald said: > > >Interesting, not even a point release for Redhat 8.0! > > Why does that scare me :) > > Was 8.0 that bad that only another .0 release could fix it? Bah. I think people were hoping they'd do that with 7. Then again, 7.0 stank enough to only prove the old .0 adage.
> Or was 8.0 really that stable? (would be a good thing :) For the most part, yes. It's been a mostly well-behaved for any point release, and especially well-behaved for a .0. > If 8.0 was really that stable, does that mean they're QA'ing things > that much more rigorously? Can we expect RH's release schedule to > now only be .0 releases that are rock solid? Maybe this is so RH can be bought out by AOL. Aren't they at 9 now as well? (psst, ;) -Mark
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
