On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, at 12:38pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Personally, I think that's a bad way to look at it. Spam is our problem > and if we were vulnerable to either unauthenticated proxying or SMTP > relaying, then it's -OUR- problem.
That is a completely different situation. Spam is a problem. But we were not talking about spam; we were talking about being present on somebody's list of something-or-other. There is a subtle but important difference there. On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, at 12:33pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Apparently, it thinks rogue.codemeta.com is an open proxy. AFAIK, they are wrong (see below). If someone can demonstrate that rogue is an open proxy, then I will immediately move to get that fixed, since that *is* our problem. But the fact that they are wrong is not our problem. | $ telnet rogue.codemeta.com 80 | Trying 199.125.75.14... | Connected to rogue.codemeta.com (199.125.75.14). | Escape character is '^]'. < CONNECT mail.ntisys.com:25 HTTP/1.0 < > HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed > Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:52:52 GMT -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss