Lots of interesting commentary here.

* Why do I use RBL's in the 1st place? Because I would much rather reject 
mail before it's received than after. If I filter it out after then they 
know that I have accepted it. The fact that they always try multiple times 
after a 500 series error code is just even more grating. If you don't run 
your own domain, then you really don't have access to this technique. 

* Derek Martin said that you have no way of knowing if you've missed 
important mail. Not true: I get a report every morning showing what 
senders were rejected. (I just wasn't paying attention.)

* Jeff Kinz says it's not important to make sure that you are accepted by 
all RBLs. I totally disagree on this one. You don't have to be accepted by 
an RBL but you should at least know why they are rejecting you and to 
have at least made the effort to try to clear up the conflict. Like I 
mentioned earlier, some RBLs base themselves on vastly different criteria. 
Some criteria are acceptable and some are not (to me). For example, I 
mentioned one RBL that rejects all clients of uunet. Another rejects all 
dynamic ip addresses. You have to decide what sets are right for you.

This problem between easynet and codemeta issuch an incredibly small 
factor of how much I reject on a daily basis, that I would recommend 
anyone who wanted to use a good rbl to *start* with this one.

-- 
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

Reply via email to