On Nov 16, 2005, at 12:19, Python wrote:
We have asked the Registry to
restore the affected domains, but it refuses to admit wrongdoing and
insists on restoration fees before doing so. Our fallback position is
to register secondary domains that point to the main website so
affected
customers get relief.
How does this pass the laugh test? It'd cost them as much to register
secondary domains as it would to reestablish the ones people depend on.
Boy, if I was facing losing 100 customers and could spend $600 to
ameliorate the situation there'd be no question as to the proper course
of action.
I mentioned this to Lloyd yesterday, but for the rest of the audience:
http://aitsucks.com
has some interesting things to say.
-Bill
-----
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Pager: 603.442.1833
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
